Collaboration
Collaboration
Traditional DMZ based solutions are relatively complex by nature. To ensure proper scaling close management of the infrastructure is needed. A layered security approach ensures clear separation from internal and external resources. Specific requirements within such a DMZ design e.g. hardened operating systems and the special connectivity requirements are adding additional pain to the business users. Even if the solution is very secure, it comes with a high price tag and time to market is very low.
As mentioned in the last Blog entry a design build around a Web Application Firewall WAF can address some of this pain. I don’t want to dig deeper into the technical possibilities of such devices but some highlights are:
The DMZ design based approach added up to an investment need of 160’000 USD and all together a period of 23 weeks until go live. The same solution designed with a WAF gateway resulted in a cost saving of 60% and instead of 23 weeks “Time to Market” was reduced to 7 weeks. The risk assessment for the WAF solution testified acceptable risk level given the criticality of the information and the system.
During the implementation of the WAF design one critical learning came up again for the customer. Focusing on application based security requires additional skills which are very often not available. The ability to understand, interpret and instantiate a business request is crucial. Knowledge is needed in:
The WAF approach represents a mindset shift for the IT organization away from point solutions towards a Standardized, Simple and still Secure solution supporting fast business adaptation. It represents an innovative security solution to support value creation.
In the next article we are going to describe the basic workings of a WAF, associated risks, the ideal prerequisites and accompanying measures.
Traditional DMZ based solutions are relatively complex by nature. To ensure proper scaling close management of the infrastructure is needed. A layered security approach ensures clear separation from internal and external resources. Specific requirements within such a DMZ design e.g. hardened operating systems and the special connectivity requirements are adding additional pain to the business users. Even if the solution is very secure, it comes with a high price tag and time to market is very low.
As mentioned in the last Blog entry a design build around a Web Application Firewall WAF can address some of this pain. I don’t want to dig deeper into the technical possibilities of such devices but some highlights are:
- Ability to inspect content (not only IP address and ports)
- Moderate “Errors” in WEB applications can be hidden from the outside (preventive control)
- WEB applications can be protected against standard attacks (Cross Site Scripting, SQL Injection etc…)
- Information gathering can be prevented by e.g. blocking application specific error messages or too literate webserver information
The DMZ design based approach added up to an investment need of 160’000 USD and all together a period of 23 weeks until go live. The same solution designed with a WAF gateway resulted in a cost saving of 60% and instead of 23 weeks “Time to Market” was reduced to 7 weeks. The risk assessment for the WAF solution testified acceptable risk level given the criticality of the information and the system.
During the implementation of the WAF design one critical learning came up again for the customer. Focusing on application based security requires additional skills which are very often not available. The ability to understand, interpret and instantiate a business request is crucial. Knowledge is needed in:
- Web application design and security
- Network design and network protocols
- IT security
- Service Delivery / Service Support (key – it is not a “box” any more)
The WAF approach represents a mindset shift for the IT organization away from point solutions towards a Standardized, Simple and still Secure solution supporting fast business adaptation. It represents an innovative security solution to support value creation.
In the next article we are going to describe the basic workings of a WAF, associated risks, the ideal prerequisites and accompanying measures.
Responses
Re: Collaboration
You might need to consider WAF if you need to become PCI DSS compliant. You should either show that you have a documented secure SDL process in place, or you can install a WAF.
Another interesting way is to use a WAF in pre-production testing: Feedback the found errors dirrectly to the developers to improve their code.